1999 NFL Linear Regression Power Ratings

FINAL RATINGS --- Updated Through SUPER BOWL XXXIV

RankTeamRatingHFHomeRoad
1St Louis112.36-1.8111.46113.26
2Jacksonville108.710.7109.06108.36
3Kansas City106.582.7107.93105.23
4Oakland106.44-0.6106.14106.74
5Buffalo105.90-0.5105.65106.15
6Indianapolis105.060.8105.46104.66
7Minnesota104.740.5104.99104.49
8Tennessee104.100.2104.20104.00
9Seattle103.811.6104.61103.01
10Denver103.012.4104.21101.81
11Washington102.831.7103.68101.98
12Tampa Bay102.770.4102.97102.57
13N Y Jets102.211.5102.96101.46
14Baltimore101.950.3102.10101.80
15Dallas101.751.3102.40101.10
16Green Bay101.381.2101.98100.78
17New England101.370.9101.82100.92
18Detroit101.092.4102.2999.89
19Carolina99.510.399.6699.36
20Miami99.011.699.8198.21
21Pittsburgh98.654.2100.7596.55
22San Diego98.64-0.298.5498.74
23Chicago97.831.198.3897.28
24N Y Giants96.541.297.1495.94
25Philadelphia95.140.095.1495.14
26Atlanta93.621.394.2792.97
27Arizona90.592.391.7489.44
28Cincinnati89.531.290.1388.93
29San Francisco89.41-1.488.7190.11
30New Orleans88.52-2.887.1289.92
31Cleveland86.960.086.9686.96
NFL Average100.000.8100.4099.60

1999 NFL Aver Line Played Against Power Ratings

FINAL RATINGS --- Updated Through SUPER BOWL XXXIV

RankTeamRatingHFHomeRoad
1Jacksonville107.182.7108.51105.85
2St Louis105.752.5107.00104.49
3Minnesota105.452.9106.89104.01
4Green Bay104.482.6105.80103.16
5Indianapolis103.212.7104.58101.85
6Seattle103.032.6104.31101.74
7Buffalo102.572.8103.98101.16
8Tennessee102.132.6103.41100.85
9Washington101.903.2103.50100.29
10Miami101.853.1103.37100.32
11Tampa Bay101.772.3102.92100.63
12Dallas101.652.9103.09100.21
13Kansas City101.343.4103.0499.64
Oakland101.343.3102.9899.70
15Denver100.953.4102.6399.26
16New England100.463.4102.1698.77
17Pittsburgh99.862.3101.0298.69
18N Y Jets99.782.5101.0698.51
19Detroit99.522.8100.9098.14
20Baltimore99.322.0100.3598.30
21Atlanta98.722.499.9397.51
22Carolina98.661.599.4197.90
23San Francisco98.072.199.0997.04
24N Y Giants98.002.999.4596.54
25San Diego97.112.898.5395.70
26Chicago96.503.498.2094.79
27Arizona96.332.697.6595.01
28New Orleans95.432.596.6994.17
29Cincinnati94.632.395.7893.48
30Philadelphia93.132.894.5391.73
31Cleveland89.900.089.9089.90
NFL Average100.002.6101.3198.69

1999 NFL Average Result Versus Line Power Ratings

FINAL RATINGS --- Updated Through SUPER BOWL XXXIV

RankTeamRatingHFHomeRoad
1St Louis106.61-1.8105.71107.51
2Kansas City105.242.7106.59103.89
3Oakland105.10-0.6104.80105.40
4Buffalo103.33-0.5103.08103.58
5Baltimore102.630.3102.78102.48
6N Y Jets102.421.5103.17101.67
7Denver102.072.4103.27100.87
8Philadelphia102.010.0102.01102.01
9Tennessee101.970.2102.07101.87
10Indianapolis101.850.8102.25101.45
11Detroit101.572.4102.77100.37
12Jacksonville101.530.7101.88101.18
San Diego101.53-0.2101.43101.63
14Chicago101.331.1101.88100.78
15Tampa Bay101.000.4101.20100.80
16Washington100.931.7101.78100.08
17New England100.900.9101.35100.45
18Carolina100.850.3101.00100.70
19Seattle100.781.6101.5899.98
20Dallas100.111.3100.7699.46
21Minnesota99.290.599.5499.04
22Pittsburgh98.794.2100.8996.69
23N Y Giants98.541.299.1497.94
24Miami97.161.697.9696.36
25Cleveland97.060.097.0697.06
26Green Bay96.901.297.5096.30
27Cincinnati94.901.295.5094.30
Atlanta94.901.395.5594.25
29Arizona94.262.395.4193.11
30New Orleans93.10-2.891.7094.50
31San Francisco91.34-1.490.6492.04
NFL Average100.000.8100.4099.60



The above Linear Regression Power Ratings are based upon a Linear Regression analysis of points scored and allowed (i.e. Margin of Victories and Defeats). Simply explained, the above Ratings reflect differences based upon the following: "If Team A beats Team B by 7, and Team C beats Team D by 13, and Team C beats Team A by 2, etc., how much better is Team A than Team D?" Thus the above Ratings attempt to compare all teams based upon who beats who and by how much. The Ratings tend to be more accurate as the season progresses.


The Average Line Played Against Power Ratings use a similar concept but are based on the lines used by the linesmakers in all of a team's games. The more that a team is favored, the higher its Rating. These Ratings are a good tool in evaluating and assessing how the linesmaker views each team and can be used as a guide in makeing lines on upcoming games based upon the lines that have been madein prior games.



The Average Result Versus Line Power Ratings also use the concept described above but do so from the perspective of how a teams has performed relative to the pointspread. For example, a team that is favored by 7 points and wins be 10 points has exceeded the line by 3 points while their opponent has fallen short by 3 points. Similarly a 4 point underdog that wins the game straight up by 10 points has exceeded the line by 14 points and their opponent has fallen short by 14. These Ratings can used a measurement of overachievement and underachievement by each team.

Each team's raw Rating is adjusted for their individual Home Field Advantage (HFA) by adding one-half of the HFA to their raw rating to determine their Home Rating and subtracting one-half of the HFA from their raw Rating to determine their Road Rating.


HOME PAGE / Stats & Match-ups / Subscribers' Selections / Free Daily Selection / Future Odds
Sample Newsletters / Stuff for Sale / Power Ratings / Polls & Surveys / Articles & Features
Sports Betting Forum / Handicapping Contests / Other Resources / Commentary / How to Contact Us